Aimée Little
Related Authors
Noel B. Salazar
KU Leuven
Tristan Carter
McMaster University
Erika Gál
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Ellery Frahm
Yale University
Christina Tsoraki
University of Leicester
Xavier Terradas
CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Spanish National Research Council)
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Ramiro Barberena
National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Gary Feinman
Field Museum
Selena Vitezović
Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade, Serbia
InterestsView All (13)
Uploads
Papers by Aimée Little
During microscopic analysis, it became clear that many residues lack diagnostic traits, and thus an assessment of the extent to which each residue can be identified was conducted. The degree to which residues were able to be identified was further investigated with a variable pressure scanning electron microscope (SEM). SEM images of the reference residues were compared to the reflected VLM micrographs of the same residues, which improved characterisation in some cases. Residues were grouped into three categories (diagnostic, distinctive, and non-distinctive) within a visual characterisation guide. Our in situ microscopic analyses indicated that few residue types have diagnostic traits that allow them to be identified unambiguously, and thus further characterisation techniques are often required.
Link to paper here: http://dx.doi.org/10.11141/ia.42.5
Key words – Mesolithic; Final Palaeolithic; Early Neolithic; Westphalia
http://www.dguf.de/index.php?id=9