GenAI today: rising up or sliding down? (opinion)

GenAI today: rising up or sliding down? (opinion)

Be with me for a while again and speculate about the current state of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) apparently riding the new technology hype cycle defined by Gartner. The crazy fast pace of GenAI adoption we see since ChatGPT premiere is producing seemingly unlimited expectations about its future applications. The possibly disruptive capabilities of generative AI inspires scientists, media, business, and general public. Discourse about GenAI has become a trendy thing. Today AI is literally everywhere on the Internet and has already leaked into the regular small talks in the real world. It is a clear sign that, according to Gartner’s model of new technology hype cycle the phase, GenAI is currently the first phase of the cycle. The enthusiastic, awe-fueled popularity growth, which leads to the peak of inflated expectations. Most evidence suggests that we are not going to reach the peak soon, rather we’ll follow the bright, straight path up climbing high for a long time.

Everything is going up

Wherever we look all stuff related to GenAI explodes. Social media are spitting out news, memes, arguments, and trivia about artificial intelligence. The new events, symposia, congresses dedicated to AI generally ad to its applications in specific areas mushrooming abundantly. Trainings, courses, post-diploma studies are offered more and more aggressively. Linkedin – one social platform I am frequently on, is literally flooded with AI content. Users are sharing pictures, audios, videos, and posts created by recently launched GenAI tools. Many of users escalates in self-promotion as GenAI experts, tutors, evangelists or challengers. My feed on the platform looks like infected by GenAI FOMO (fear of missing out). Everybody looks like they are desperate to jump on the bandwagon of artificial intelligence. Outside social media the same trend makes corporation announce a new AI project every week and high schools and universities open AI-dedicated curricula. The technology itself is also on the rise. The capabilities of newly deployed models exceed the former models by far. The new model are made and launched frequently and new applications for them are found every day. Some of them immediately win users attention and approval. Chat GPT itself was the fastest-growing consumer application in history. The observation undoubtedly shows us that, if only Gartner’s cycle exists, Generative AI is in its first phase.

The challenge of the cycle phases

The Gartner’s cycle describes the process of new technology absorption by society. It means it is  sensitive to many factors changing the specific process and deviate it from the theoretical pattern. One of the best examples is the behavior of asset markets. The cycles of investor sentiment exist objectively. The consequence of bull and bear market phase applies to every asset, but yet nobody is extremely efficient in predicting the future performance of specific asset. It is just so hard to spot the moment when bulls give up and bears prevail (and vice versa). If only any investors knew that shares he bought are going to drop ... well but generally they didn’t. The same is with Gartner’s cycle. With a high level of certainty we know that one day our expectations toward GenAI become inflated and the technology bring us disappointment of some sort. The other big things will arise and big players, investors, and media will turn their interest to them, leaving Gen AI on the slide to the trough of disillusionment. But how long we will wait for this moment. Are we at the start or at the very end of the growing phase of the hype cycle?

In my opinion, there are warning signs already here

Despite the impression, that everything is moving up in the Gen AI I see some signs of disappointment. It is subjective view, of course, but probably those kind of personal, biased, human-specific opinions are today the last stand of where humans can exercise their expertise better than algorithms. Where do I see those warning signs? Firstly, Nvidia shares are not growing like crazy anymore. They have been in a clear horizontal trend since May 2024. Some can argue, that Nvidia is already in the next phase of market cycle, some say it is only a correction of the otherwise impressive growth. This is a point - we can’t tell if Nvidia will rise or slide in next month and whether its price reached only a local bump or historical maximum three months ago, in June 2023. We will know it, however, when time passes. The same is with GenAI. I hear more frequent skeptical voices about practical application of the technology in business. I meet many doubts about European AI Act and experts saying it is going to slow down the adoption of GenAI. During professional events it is easy to find a debate, fire chat or keynote sharing the view that GenAi is overhyped. All those signs could mean that we are somewhere close to the peak of the cycle. On the other hand there is still a lot of positive energy and actual progress in the area. Maybe those warning signs means something, but maybe not. I my opinion  everybody who confidently says that GenAI is already on the slide to disappointment just grasps at straws. I do think, however, that,in my opinion, the question of whether GenAI is on its ride up or starting to slide down is valid and meaningful today.


Gartner’s hype cycle enhanced by the question in subject. Source: Wikipedia.org

Adam D'Abbracci

Founder @ Proteus, a GenAI-powered social engineering simulator that continuously trains employees to spot real-world threats • Tech Lead, SRE @ The New York Times • Previously IAM @ Disney • Engaging Public Speaker

5h

We’re definitely in the first phase of a long period of advancements. The chatbot use case that’s driven the majority of recent growth in the sector is just the tip of the iceberg. It was the “easiest” (in the sense that it’s a single modality and LLMs have been researched for years) to commercialize and monetize. Now that there’s a proven demand for the tech, money is pouring into R&D, so continue to see advancements in the space. They might not come as quickly or be as significant compared to the sudden explosion of LLMs, but they’ll be consistent. The new video generation models like Runway and SORA are great examples of this. Also, NVIDIAs stock price isn’t a signal of the overall space - they were in the right place to ride that initial wave to wild heights and now other companies are catching up 🙂

Like
Reply
Bartosz Pacuszka

Data&AI practitioner and executive making things happened.

6h

Wojciech - Looking at what's been happening in the market over the past 1.5 years, I would say the peak has already passed, but... ... AI is unlike any other technology, and the last year of AI development is also incomparable to the growth of other known technologies. I believe AI will define its own, unparalleled dynamic of development and capabilities – let’s see what the next year brings. One thing I’m sure of… it will be a year full of unexpected new experiences🤓

The period of spectacular advancements in generative AI capabilities is behind us. Further growth in capabilities will require increasing amounts of time and resources. In this sense, we have indeed passed the peak of the first wave of excitement about this technology. However, it is so groundbreaking that it will stay with us and profoundly change our reality. But I believe this will happen very slowly. Why? Not due to fear or legal regulations. Rather, because of the need to understand how to navigate its limitations and use it in the right way. Implementing generative AI requires a mix of very different predispositions, skills, and knowledge from various fields: technical expertise, process analysis skills, communication, risk analysis aptitude, and even knowledge of ethics. In companies and organizations, this will require both high-level and low-level thinking. I believe this technology will cause a significant disparity in competitiveness. Agile and bold companies will be able to leverage it, while less flexible organizations will have to catch up, incurring substantial costs.

Marcin Brdys

#AI he/him #DataScientist

9h

both its .. evolving into 3-4D space 😁

Jan Maria Kowalski, MBA

AI | Data Science | RPA | Strategy | Speaker

9h

In my opinion, we are at a pivotal moment for AI. Yes, I hear more and more talk about the "AI bubble," and I understand those concerns. After the initial excitement, we’re now entering a phase of validation—and that’s a good thing. Now, companies need to demonstrate concrete implementations and tangible benefits from AI. Personally, I believe AI will stand the test of time. It’s a truly groundbreaking technology, enabling the automation of tasks that were previously impossible. But let’s be honest—not every company knows how to leverage it. I expect we’ll see a growing divide between the leaders who successfully implement AI and those who fall behind. I am convinced that after this phase of scrutiny, AI will continue to be a key driver of change in business. However, expectations will become more realistic, and companies will focus on specific, well-defined applications. The key now is education and training that showcases the real value of AI and successful case studies. That’s why I strongly encourage everyone to check out the Liderzy.AI program, which was developed in collaboration with Andrzej Sobczak and provides exactly this kind of practical knowledge and inspiration.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics