Learn some best practices and tools to make your code review process more effective, efficient, and enjoyable. Improve your code quality, productivity, and skills.

To enhance your code review process, start by clearly defining goals and expectations for your team. Make sure everyone understands the purpose of the code review, whether it's to catch bugs, improve code quality, or share knowledge. Set specific criteria for what constitutes a successful review, like adherence to coding standards or efficient problem-solving. Encourage constructive feedback and collaboration, emphasizing that the goal is not to criticize but to collectively improve the code. Clearly communicating these expectations helps streamline the process, making code reviews more effective and fostering a positive team dynamic.

Made in Chicago Company Directory

1 Define clear goals and expectations

Before you start reviewing or submitting code, it's important to have a clear understanding of what you want to accomplish and what your expectations are of others. Common goals of code reviews include detecting and fixing bugs, errors, and vulnerabilities; enforcing coding standards and style guides; improving the design and architecture of the code; sharing knowledge and feedback among the team; and promoting collaboration and learning. It's also essential to communicate these goals and expectations to your team members, as well as agree on the scope, frequency, and format of the code reviews. For instance, you can decide if you want to review every commit, pull request, or feature, as well as how you want to provide and receive feedback (e.g., inline comments, chat messages, or video calls).

Add your perspective

Raafat Abaid

Senior Software Engineer @ IBM | Cloud Solutions, DevOps, Automation, OpenShift OCP, GitOps, ArgoCD, Helm Charts "Cloud Migration expert"
Report contribution
Firstly, establish clear coding standards and guidelines for consistency. Utilize automated tools for static code analysis to catch common issues early. Encourage a collaborative culture, emphasizing constructive feedback and knowledge sharing. Introduce lightweight code review meetings for in-depth discussions. Consider rotating reviewers to bring diverse perspectives. Implement a systematic checklist covering code quality, security, and performance aspects. Embrace a continuous learning culture, providing training on emerging technologies and best practices. Regularly reassess and iterate on the process based on feedback and evolving development needs for a more efficient and effective code review workflow.

Like
Mahika Agrawal

ex - Nuclei | CS | Data-driven Product Management | ML
Report contribution
To enhance your code review process, start by clearly defining goals and expectations for your team. Make sure everyone understands the purpose of the code review, whether it's to catch bugs, improve code quality, or share knowledge. Set specific criteria for what constitutes a successful review, like adherence to coding standards or efficient problem-solving. Encourage constructive feedback and collaboration, emphasizing that the goal is not to criticize but to collectively improve the code. Clearly communicating these expectations helps streamline the process, making code reviews more effective and fostering a positive team dynamic.

Like
Sujeet Kumar

Senior Software Engineer | Cloud -AWS & Azure | Gen AI, RAG, LLMs, Agent | Microservice, RESTful APIs | Dynamics 365 F&O, PowerApp
Report contribution
ðŸ’¡ ð—˜ð—»ð—µð—®ð—»ð—°ð—² ð—¬ð—¼ð˜‚ð—¿ ð—–ð—¼ð—±ð—² ð—¥ð—²ð˜ƒð—¶ð—²ð˜„ ð—£ð—¿ð—¼ð—°ð—²ð˜€ð˜€ ðŸ’¡ ðŸŽ¯ ð—¦ð—²ð˜ ð—–ð—¼ð—±ð—² ð—¥ð—²ð˜ƒð—¶ð—²ð˜„ ð—¢ð—¯ð—·ð—²ð—°ð˜ð—¶ð˜ƒð—²ð˜€: Focus on bug detection, coding standards, and architectural improvements. ðŸ¤ ð—£ð—¿ð—¼ð—ºð—¼ð˜ð—² ð—§ð—²ð—®ð—º ð—–ð—¼ð—¹ð—¹ð—®ð—¯ð—¼ð—¿ð—®ð˜ð—¶ð—¼ð—»: Encourage knowledge sharing and peer feedback for collective learning. ðŸ”„ ð—˜ð˜€ð˜ð—®ð—¯ð—¹ð—¶ð˜€ð—µ ð—¥ð—²ð˜ƒð—¶ð—²ð˜„ ð—¥ð—¶ð˜ð˜‚ð—®ð—¹ð˜€: Regularly assess scope, frequency, and feedback mechanisms. #SoftwareEngineering #CodeReview #Teamwork #ContinuousImprovement #BestPractices ðŸš€ðŸ‘¨ðŸ’»ðŸ”

Like
Eisa Mehmood

ð‘ð’–ð’ð’ ð‘ºð’•ð’‚ð’„ð’Œ ð‘¨ð’ð’…ð’“ð’ð’Šð’… ð‘¨ð’‘ð’‘ ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“ || ð‘¼ð‘°/ð‘¼ð‘¿ ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“ || ð‘±ð’‚ð’—ð’‚ || ð‘ºð’•ð’–ð’…ð’†ð’ð’• ð’ð’‡ ð‘ºð’ð’‡ð’•ð’˜ð’‚ð’“ð’† ð‘¬ð’ð’ˆð’Šð’ð’†ð’†ð’“ð’Šð’ð’ˆ || ð‘·ð’“ð’ð’ˆð’“ð’‚ð’Žð’Žð’†ð’“ ð’‚ð’ð’… ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“
Report contribution
Absolutely, defining clear goals and expectations is fundamental for effective code reviews. These include bug detection, enforcing coding standards, enhancing code design, and fostering collaboration and learning within the team. Communicating these goals and aligning expectations with team members ensures a shared understanding. Establishing the scope, frequency, and format of code reviews is crucial â€“ whether reviewing every commit, pull request, or specific features. Choose feedback mechanisms such as inline comments, chat messages, or video calls based on team preferences. A well-structured code review process contributes to code quality, team collaboration, and continuous improvement.

Like
Fernando Trejo

Founder & CEO of ${DarkMode} Devs | Full Stack Developer | Student | Ambassador
Report contribution
Having code standards and enforcing them, ensures code consistency and readability. Next, define what aspects should be focused on during reviews, such as optimization, security, and readability. Then provide training for new team members on the code standards and review process and continuously support the development of review skills in existing members. I would take it a step further and encouraging positive, constructive feedback. Reviews should focus on the code, not the author. Highlighting good practices or innovative solutions can be as valuable as pointing out issues. Lastly, pair programming in the coding process would reduce the number of issues and also promotes knowledge sharing.

Like

Load more contributions

2 Choose the right tools and platforms

Using the right tools and platforms for code reviews can make a big difference for their success. Look for options that support the languages and frameworks you work with, integrate with version control and collaboration systems, provide features and functionalities that meet your needs and preferences, and have good documentation and support. Popular tools and platforms for code reviews include GitHub, GitLab, CodeGuru, and CodeClimate. GitHub is a web-based platform that hosts code repositories and offers code review features such as pull requests, issues, comments, suggestions, and reviews. GitLab is similar to GitHub but offers more customization options and self-hosting. CodeGuru is a service by Amazon Web Services that uses machine learning to analyze code and provide recommendations for improvement. CodeClimate is a tool that measures the quality and maintainability of code while providing insights on complexity, duplication, security, and style.

Add your perspective

Mike Harris

Manager of Software Engineering at Elsevier
Report contribution
Pair program. Mob program. Abandon code reviews for the anti-pattern they are! (For some reason LinkedIn wants me to write more, but there is no more; itâ€™s as simple as whatâ€™s written above. The truth is normal short and sweet, bullshit requires considerably more verbiage and hyperbole)

Like
Sujeet Kumar

Senior Software Engineer | Cloud -AWS & Azure | Gen AI, RAG, LLMs, Agent | Microservice, RESTful APIs | Dynamics 365 F&O, PowerApp
(edited)
Report contribution
ðŸŒ ð—¥ð—¶ð—´ð—µð˜ ð—§ð—¼ð—¼ð—¹ð˜€ ð—®ð—»ð—± ð—£ð—¹ð—®ð˜ð—³ð—¼ð—¿ð—ºð˜€ ð—³ð—¼ð—¿ ð—–ð—¼ð—±ð—² ð—¥ð—²vð—¶ð—²ð˜„ð˜€ ðŸŒ ðŸ”§ Optimize Your Code Review Process ðŸ”§ ðŸ’» ð—œð—»ð˜ð—²ð—´ð—¿ð—®ð˜ð—² ð˜„ð—¶ð˜ð—µ ð—©ð—–ð—¦: Choose tools compatible with your version control system. ðŸ¤– ð—”ð—¶-ð—•ð—®ð˜€ð—²ð—± ð—”ð—»ð—®ð—¹ð˜†ð˜€ð—¶ð˜€: Leverage AI tools like CodeGuru for smarter reviews. ðŸ“Š ð—¤ð˜‚ð—®ð—¹ð—¶ð˜ð˜† & ð— ð—®ð—¶ð—»ð˜ð—®ð—¶ð—»ð—®ð—¯ð—¶ð—¹ð—¶ð˜ð˜† ð—œð—»ð˜€ð—¶ð—´ð—µð˜ð˜€: Utilize platforms like CodeClimate for in-depth code quality analysis. #CodeReview #SoftwareEngineering #DevOps #GitHub #GitLab #AWSCodeGuru #CodeClimate ðŸš€ðŸ‘©ðŸ’»ðŸ”

Like
Eisa Mehmood

ð‘ð’–ð’ð’ ð‘ºð’•ð’‚ð’„ð’Œ ð‘¨ð’ð’…ð’“ð’ð’Šð’… ð‘¨ð’‘ð’‘ ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“ || ð‘¼ð‘°/ð‘¼ð‘¿ ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“ || ð‘±ð’‚ð’—ð’‚ || ð‘ºð’•ð’–ð’…ð’†ð’ð’• ð’ð’‡ ð‘ºð’ð’‡ð’•ð’˜ð’‚ð’“ð’† ð‘¬ð’ð’ˆð’Šð’ð’†ð’†ð’“ð’Šð’ð’ˆ || ð‘·ð’“ð’ð’ˆð’“ð’‚ð’Žð’Žð’†ð’“ ð’‚ð’ð’… ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“
Report contribution
Selecting the right tools and platforms significantly impacts the success of code reviews. Look for options supporting your languages, integrating with version control, and offering features aligned with your needs. Platforms like GitHub provide web-based hosting and comprehensive code review features, while GitLab allows customization and self-hosting. CodeGuru, an AWS service, employs machine learning for code analysis and improvement recommendations. CodeClimate measures code quality, highlighting aspects like complexity, duplication, security, and style. Prioritize tools with good documentation and support for a smoother and more effective code review process tailored to your team's workflow.

Like
Debasis Ray

Executive VP & Head @ Cybage Software | Digital Product Engineering, Operational Excellence
Report contribution
Tooling is everything. Right from Jira / jenkins / Git to any class of tools are great. On static code analysis, snyk is great for security, sonar is my favourite. Veracode, Checkmarx are great too but sometimes debugging dynamic scans errors are nightmare. We do use manual marker analysis (technical PM role) - this simple story, to PR to commit ratios by teams, its deviation, PR rejections etc. When we get tools like sleuth, Code Climate Velocity, Pluralsite Flow, Jelleyfish, Umani ...I get excited. Fundamentally, I am great fan of DORA matrix, and 4 godly parameters - deployment frequency, MTTx, Lead Time to Change, Change failure rates - Cool. Simple goal is to move low, normal to high to elite. Shift left works well.

Like
Divyansh Tripathi

Tech Enthusiasm ðŸ§‘ðŸ’» || DSA || LLM's || DevOps || SQL || Web-Development || C++ || Core JAVA || Cloud-Computing ðŸŒ ||...
Report contribution
Leverage code review tools to streamline the process and make it more efficient. These tools provide features such as code highlighting, inline comments, and automated checks for coding standards and best practices. Popular code review tools include GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Gerrit.

Like

Load more contributions

3 Follow best practices and guidelines

To make code reviews more effective and efficient, both reviewers and authors should follow certain best practices and guidelines. It's important to review small and frequent changes, rather than large and infrequent ones. Furthermore, it's essential to review the code, not the person, avoiding personal attacks or criticism. Be respectful, constructive, and specific in your feedback, using positive and negative examples to explain your suggestions. Ask questions, clarify doubts, and suggest alternatives if you disagree or don't understand something. Address the feedback promptly, testing the code before submitting or approving it for functionality, performance, and compatibility. Finally, document the code well with descriptive names, comments, and commit messages.

Add your perspective

Rushikesh Jadhav

Junior Backend Engineer | Expert in Java, Spring Boot, AWS | Skilled in Multithreading & Microservices | Passionate About Scalable Solutions | Proven in Enhancing System Performance & Code Quality
Report contribution
Adhering to best practices and guidelines streamlines your code review process. Establish clear standards for coding conventions, documentation, and design patterns. This ensures consistency and readability across the codebase, making reviews more efficient. By following best practices, you create a foundation for high-quality code that is easier to review, maintain, and scale.

Like
Sujeet Kumar

Senior Software Engineer | Cloud -AWS & Azure | Gen AI, RAG, LLMs, Agent | Microservice, RESTful APIs | Dynamics 365 F&O, PowerApp
Report contribution
ðŸš€ ð—•ð—²ð˜€ð˜ ð—£ð—¿ð—®ð—°ð˜ð—¶ð—°ð—²ð˜€ & ð—šð˜‚ð—¶ð—±ð—²ð—¹ð—¶ð—»ð—²ð˜€ ð—¶ð—» ð—–ð—¼ð—±ð—² ð—¥ð—²ð˜ƒð—¶ð—²ð˜„ ðŸš€ ðŸ” Elevate Review Process for Maximum Efficiency ðŸ” ðŸ“š ð—˜ð—»ð—³ð—¼ð—¿ð—°ð—² ð—–ð—¼ð—±ð—¶ð—»ð—´ ð—¦ð˜ð—®ð—»ð—±ð—®ð—¿ð—±ð˜€: Implement style guides for consistent code quality. ðŸ”„ ð—™ð—¼ð—°ð˜‚ð˜€ ð—¼ð—» ð—–ð—¼ð—¹ð—¹ð—®ð—¯ð—¼ð—¿ð—®ð˜ð—¶ð˜ƒð—² ð—Ÿð—²ð—®ð—¿ð—»ð—¶ð—»ð—´: Encourage team discussions and shared understanding. ðŸž ð—£ð—¿ð—¶ð—¼ð—¿ð—¶ð˜ð—¶ð˜‡ð—² ð—•ð˜‚ð—´ ð——ð—²ð˜ð—²ð—°ð˜ð—¶ð—¼ð—»: Focus on identifying and resolving errors early. #SoftwareDevelopment #CodeReviewExcellence #TeamCollaboration #CodingStandards #ContinuousLearning ðŸ–¥ï¸ðŸ’¡ðŸ‘¨ðŸ’»

Like
Eisa Mehmood

ð‘ð’–ð’ð’ ð‘ºð’•ð’‚ð’„ð’Œ ð‘¨ð’ð’…ð’“ð’ð’Šð’… ð‘¨ð’‘ð’‘ ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“ || ð‘¼ð‘°/ð‘¼ð‘¿ ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“ || ð‘±ð’‚ð’—ð’‚ || ð‘ºð’•ð’–ð’…ð’†ð’ð’• ð’ð’‡ ð‘ºð’ð’‡ð’•ð’˜ð’‚ð’“ð’† ð‘¬ð’ð’ˆð’Šð’ð’†ð’†ð’“ð’Šð’ð’ˆ || ð‘·ð’“ð’ð’ˆð’“ð’‚ð’Žð’Žð’†ð’“ ð’‚ð’ð’… ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“
(edited)
Report contribution
1 .Review Small, Frequent Changes: Prioritize smaller, regular updates for more manageable and comprehensive reviews. 2. Focus on Code, Not Person: Maintain a professional tone, avoiding personal criticism. Concentrate on code improvements and adherence to standards. 3. Respectful and Constructive Feedback: Deliver feedback respectfully, providing constructive insights. Use positive and negative examples to articulate suggestions clearly. 4. Thorough Code Documentation: Document code meticulously with descriptive names, comments, and commit messages, contributing to readability and maintainability.

Like
Divyansh Tripathi

Tech Enthusiasm ðŸ§‘ðŸ’» || DSA || LLM's || DevOps || SQL || Web-Development || C++ || Core JAVA || Cloud-Computing ðŸŒ ||...
Report contribution
Define clear guidelines and standards for code reviews. This includes specifying the objectives of code reviews, the expected level of detail, and the criteria for evaluating code quality. Clear guidelines help ensure consistency and fairness in the review process.

Like
Yi Ren

Software Engineer @ General Motors | SAFe, DFSS
Report contribution
If something is unclear, ask for clarification. questions can lead to valuable discussions that clarify intentions and potential misunderstandings. When disagreeing with an approach, clearly explain why and suggest alternatives. Providing context for your suggestions can help others understand your perspective.

Like

Load more contributions

4 Learn from the feedback and improve your skills

Code reviews can be a great opportunity to learn and improve your skills as a software engineer. To make the most of this benefit, it's important to have an open-minded and receptive attitude towards feedback. Additionally, seek feedback from different perspectives and backgrounds to gain new experiences and expertise. Reflect on the feedback you receive and identify your strengths and weaknesses, then set goals and action plans to improve them. Track your progress and measure your improvement, celebrating your achievements and milestones as you go. Finally, share your feedback and learning with others to help them grow and improve too. By following these best practices and tools, you can not only enhance your code quality and productivity, but also foster a positive team culture and communication.

Add your perspective

Debasis Ray

Executive VP & Head @ Cybage Software | Digital Product Engineering, Operational Excellence
Report contribution
Oh, I live by this. We call it as Continuous X which would be CI, CD, CF - continuous feedback loop, CL - continuous learning, CR - continuous review ... and all these are well integrated in PiE. It is simple, tools or no tools, we would look for SP to PR to Commit, we would look for code smells, CC, LF etc. We would look for bugs, we would use contract based developments, we would look for log analysis, we look for non functional engineering and continuously look for patterns - like if one notices relative increase in pull request towards the end of sprints, impacting the bug count - we know, in haste something would be going wrong. Control charts are very helpful for such deviations and quickly fix that through automated alerts etc.

Like
Divyansh Tripathi

Tech Enthusiasm ðŸ§‘ðŸ’» || DSA || LLM's || DevOps || SQL || Web-Development || C++ || Core JAVA || Cloud-Computing ðŸŒ ||...
Report contribution
Ensure that feedback provided during code reviews is constructive, specific, and actionable. Focus on the code and its behavior rather than criticizing the developer personally. Encourage reviewers to offer suggestions for improvement and to explain the rationale behind their feedback. Rotate Reviewers: Rotate reviewers regularly to prevent reviewer fatigue and promote fresh perspectives. Rotating reviewers also helps distribute knowledge and ensures that multiple team members are familiar with different parts of the codebase.

Like
Rushikesh Jadhav

Junior Backend Engineer | Expert in Java, Spring Boot, AWS | Skilled in Multithreading & Microservices | Passionate About Scalable Solutions | Proven in Enhancing System Performance & Code Quality
Report contribution
Embrace feedback as an opportunity for growth. Actively seek input from reviewers and be open to suggestions for improvement. Use code reviews as a learning experience to enhance your coding skills and understanding of best practices. Incorporate the feedback into your future work to become a better developer. Continuous improvement is key to refining your code review process and producing higher-quality software.

Like
Sujeet Kumar

Senior Software Engineer | Cloud -AWS & Azure | Gen AI, RAG, LLMs, Agent | Microservice, RESTful APIs | Dynamics 365 F&O, PowerApp
Report contribution
ðŸš€ ð—Ÿð—²ð—®ð—¿ð—» ð—³ð—¿ð—¼ð—º ð˜ð—µð—² ð—™ð—²ð—²ð—±ð—¯ð—®ð—°ð—¸ & ð—œð—ºð—½ð—¿ð—¼ð˜ƒð—² ð—¦ð—¸ð—¶ð—¹ð—¹ð˜€ ðŸš€ ðŸ› ï¸ Enhance Your Code Review Expertise ðŸ› ï¸ ðŸ’¡ ð—¥ð—²ð—³ð—¹ð—²ð—°ð˜ ð—¼ð—» ð—™ð—²ð—²ð—±ð—¯ð—®ð—°ð—¸: Treat reviews as learning opportunities to grow. ðŸ“ˆ ð—œð˜ð—²ð—¿ð—®ð˜ð—¶ð˜ƒð—² ð—œð—ºð—½ð—¿ð—¼ð˜ƒð—²ð—ºð—²ð—»ð˜: Continuously refine coding techniques based on input. ðŸ¤ ð—–ð—¼ð—¹ð—¹ð—®ð—¯ð—¼ð—¿ð—®ð˜ð—¶ð˜ƒð—² ð—Ÿð—²ð—®ð—¿ð—»ð—¶ð—»ð—´: Share knowledge and insights within the team. #CodeReview #SoftwareEngineering #ContinuousImprovement #ProfessionalDevelopment #Teamwork ðŸ–¥ï¸ðŸŒŸðŸ‘©ðŸ’»

Like
Eisa Mehmood

ð‘ð’–ð’ð’ ð‘ºð’•ð’‚ð’„ð’Œ ð‘¨ð’ð’…ð’“ð’ð’Šð’… ð‘¨ð’‘ð’‘ ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“ || ð‘¼ð‘°/ð‘¼ð‘¿ ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“ || ð‘±ð’‚ð’—ð’‚ || ð‘ºð’•ð’–ð’…ð’†ð’ð’• ð’ð’‡ ð‘ºð’ð’‡ð’•ð’˜ð’‚ð’“ð’† ð‘¬ð’ð’ˆð’Šð’ð’†ð’†ð’“ð’Šð’ð’ˆ || ð‘·ð’“ð’ð’ˆð’“ð’‚ð’Žð’Žð’†ð’“ ð’‚ð’ð’… ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“
Report contribution
Absolutely, code reviews offer a valuable avenue for continuous learning and improvement as a software engineer. Embrace feedback with an open-minded attitude, recognizing it as an opportunity to refine your skills. Seek diverse perspectives to gain varied experiences and expertise. Reflect on feedback, identifying strengths and weaknesses, and establish goals and action plans for improvement. Track progress, celebrate achievements, and share your insights with others to contribute to collective growth. These practices not only enhance code quality and productivity but also foster a positive team culture and effective communication within the development team.

Like

Load more contributions

5 Hereâ€™s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that donâ€™t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

Add your perspective

Eisa Mehmood

ð‘ð’–ð’ð’ ð‘ºð’•ð’‚ð’„ð’Œ ð‘¨ð’ð’…ð’“ð’ð’Šð’… ð‘¨ð’‘ð’‘ ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“ || ð‘¼ð‘°/ð‘¼ð‘¿ ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“ || ð‘±ð’‚ð’—ð’‚ || ð‘ºð’•ð’–ð’…ð’†ð’ð’• ð’ð’‡ ð‘ºð’ð’‡ð’•ð’˜ð’‚ð’“ð’† ð‘¬ð’ð’ˆð’Šð’ð’†ð’†ð’“ð’Šð’ð’ˆ || ð‘·ð’“ð’ð’ˆð’“ð’‚ð’Žð’Žð’†ð’“ ð’‚ð’ð’… ð‘«ð’†ð’—ð’†ð’ð’ð’‘ð’†ð’“
Report contribution
Consider the importance of fostering a culture of empathy within your development team. Recognize that everyone, regardless of experience, is on a continuous learning journey. Encourage a supportive environment where team members feel comfortable seeking and providing feedback. This not only improves the quality of code reviews but also nurtures a collaborative and growth-oriented atmosphere, ultimately contributing to the success of your software projects. Embracing empathy in code reviews creates a space where individuals can learn from each other's experiences and collectively elevate the team's capabilities.

Like
Divyansh Tripathi

Tech Enthusiasm ðŸ§‘ðŸ’» || DSA || LLM's || DevOps || SQL || Web-Development || C++ || Core JAVA || Cloud-Computing ðŸŒ ||...
Report contribution
Iterate and Improve :- Continuously evaluate and iterate on the code review process based on feedback from team members and observations of its effectiveness. Experiment with different approaches, tools, and techniques to identify what works best for your team and your project. By implementing these strategies, teams can create a more effective and efficient code review process that contributes to the overall success of their software development efforts.

Like
Shubhamsinha Baghel

Associate Lead - Software at UST | Leading team in software development and integration
Report contribution
I firmly believe that increase collaborative culture by peer reviews, promoting clear standard practices like maintaining design patterns throughout web application or backend services and most important constructive feedback for continuous improvement. Always remember code reviews are opportunities to learn and raise the quality of any software.

Like
Prashant Padmanabhan

Manager | Architect | AWS | GCP | Azure | R&D | Innovation | Data Engineering | IOT | Machine Learning | NLP | Generative AI | LLM | Deep Learning| LLMOps | RAG | International FIDE rated * 3 chess player
Report contribution
Some other things we can consider are 1. Keep track of metrics: Like time taken, issues found etc this can help you improve. 2. Focus on key areas while giving feedback: Security, functionality, readability, performance impact etc 3. Time bound reviews: For critical issue fixing etc it is better to have quick turn around and also have mechanisms like notify reviewers of it as well 4. Respectful language: As everyone is continuously learning reviews should be conducted for code improvement and positive or constructive language should be used

Like

Load more contributions

Directory

Youâ€™re looking to improve your code review process. Whatâ€™s the best way to do it?

1

2

3

4

5

1 Define clear goals and expectations

2 Choose the right tools and platforms

3 Follow best practices and guidelines

4 Learn from the feedback and improve your skills

5 Hereâ€™s what else to consider

Software Engineering

Rate this article

Thanks for your feedback

More articles on Software Engineering

More relevant reading