To decide which near-miss incidents to investigate first, I have to prioritize based on potential severity and frequency. I will focus on incidents that could have resulted in significant harm or damage had circumstances been slightly different. Consider the proximity to critical operations or high-risk areas. Analyze trends and repeat occurrences to identify patterns that might signal systemic issues. Additionally, give priority to incidents involving safety-critical equipment or processes. Immediate attention should be given to incidents that pose ongoing risks to personnel, assets, or operations to prevent future accidents.

To handle workplace hazards, I prioritize near-miss investigations by: 1. Assessing Risk: Identify the potential severity and frequency of the hazard. 2. Investigating Quickly: Address near-misses promptly to prevent accidents. 3. Gathering Evidence: Collect details from witnesses, site conditions, and equipment involved. 4. Root Cause Analysis: Identify the underlying issues, not just the symptoms. 5. Implementing Solutions: Develop corrective actions to eliminate the hazard. 6. Monitoring and Review: Continuously assess to ensure long-term safety improvements. This approach helps mitigate risks before they lead to accidents.

Je crois que tout génère un grand apprentissage, qu'il s'agisse d'événements mineurs, majeurs ou critiques indésirables, la question qu'il nous appartient d'évaluer est de confirmer le niveau de maturité en SST où se trouve l'organisme, mais surtout jusqu'à quel niveau il veut atteindre. Tout doit commencer là où nous voulons aboutir. Éliminez les quasi-accidents, les échecs de maintenance, les écarts de processus, les échecs de qualité, à tous les niveaux initiaux de pannes avant que les événements indésirables puissent être exploités. Je crois donc qu'apprendre par petites déviations, partager et générer un apprentissage par couches pour les systèmes de barrières est un grand pas vers l'excellence. priorisez et apprenez toujours !