When others need to reproduce your work or troubleshoot issues, well-documented code serves as a guide. It allows them to understand your intentions and replicate the behavior or fix problems effectively.

Documentation is invaluable for new team members joining a project. It helps them get up to speed quickly and understand the existing codebase, reducing the learning curve. When it comes to reproducibility, well-documented code is crucial. If someone else needs to replicate the work or if you need to revisit the code after some time, comprehensive documentation ensures that the original process, assumptions, and methods are clear and accessible. It helps in recreating the exact environment and conditions under which the code was developed and tested.

Documentation is a central part of software development. There is a lot to cover from quick start guides, to examples and API references. Don't forget to document the build process, especially any flags that influence the outcome.

As a massive over-generalisation (but so is the question) documentation should concentrate in filling in the ‘why’ not the ‘what’. ‘What’ should be clear from the code and the tests. Even so that can take time and knowing the right entry points so big picture documentation on architecture still have a major part to play. What those don’t communicate is ‘why’ - for example why one specific solution was preferred over another maybe more seemingly obvious one, business decisions informing or impacting the solution or some external reason that requires things are approached in a particular way. That’s why some practices such as DSDM always had a nominated scribe. Names, locations, modifications, authorship - those belong in source control.

Code documentation, a fundamental software development practice, involves adding comments, explanations, and annotations to code. It clarifies what the code does, why it does it, and how it functions. Key benefits include improved clarity, streamlined maintenance and debugging, enhanced collaboration, easier knowledge transfer, code reusability, support for quality assurance, and efficient problem-solving. Documentation encompasses comments, annotations, descriptions, and usage examples, contributing to better code understandability and the longevity of software projects.

Agreed, Documenting code is important for reproducibility because it ensures that the work I've done can be understood and replicated by myself or others in the future. Without proper documentation, it's like trying to follow a recipe without any instructions

When it comes to coding, I have found documentation to be extremely helpful. As someone who enjoys writing documentation, I always make sure to create documents related to any projects I work on. There have been instances where I have come across rarely used technologies that lacked sufficient documentation. This made the process much more difficult, as I had to spend a lot of time going through the code to understand it. If, after all that effort, the code didn't turn out to be useful for any future projects, then all that time would have been wasted. In my opinion, documenting your code is a professional and considerate practice that benefits both yourself and others.

Projects evolve through many decisions made over time, and most of decisions change how developers need to interact with the application. Creating documentation on how to use, develop, and troubleshoot is essential to making sure new and existing developers have a clear and shared understanding of the project's details.

Imagine code without comments as a silent movie; you see things happening but no clue why. It's like a chef who cooks a masterpiece but forgets the recipe. Next time? You're making mystery soup. Documenting code ensures your future self doesn't end up like a detective in a library with no labels. 'Was this line a stroke of genius or just a typo?' Without notes, it's less like coding, more like culinary chaos or silent film confusion.

Documentation clears up the WHY behind the code and the logic. That is the whole point of it! Why a certain decision was made, why it was coded like that is what great documentation is all about. A person unfamiliar with the code base can understand the code by reading it but understanding the decision making and the mind behind that code is what documentation is about. It clears up any assumptions that were made, design decisions, algorithmic decisions, formatting or any other decision that might have gone into that piece of code.

Have great understanding of the code. I am referring to a separate document instead of a comment here: 1. Start with a title 2. Have an aim or abstract of the document 3. Name of file/namespace/product/page 4. Specify if documenting an RCA, algorithm or design. 5. Add a description of all assumptions considered 6. Add the core aspect, which is to be conveyed. Could be an code snippet to a architecture diagram 7. Add flow charts of relevant 8. If not standard add the execution steps 9. Include sample I/O or test cases of relevant 10. Conclude with version details

1. Be Clear and Concise: Write comments that are easy to understand. Think of it as explaining your code to someone who doesn't speak 'code' fluently. 2. Explain 'Why', Not Just 'What': Your code tells what it does. Your comments should explain why it does it. The reasoning is often more valuable than the implementation. 3. Keep It Updated: Outdated comments are like expired milk in the fridge; not helpful and potentially misleading. Update your documentation as your code evolves. 4. Use Consistent Style: Stick to a documentation style or format. Whether it's inline comments, block comments, or external documentation, consistency makes it easier for others (and future you) to follow along.

Documenting are necessary but should more in to HLD/LLD, UML, workflow diagram, and code should be redable and understandle (self explanatory) with comments and descriptions. TDD should be followed to understand the functionality. It is good practice to include all information in read me file and well defined commit comments with jira ID to track the usecase.

Today's code is tomorrow's legacy. And in this ever accelerating world of engineering, it's important that your documentation is searchable and meaningful. Don't be afraid to leave your name in the documentation. As yesterday's legacy, sometimes needs an update ;)

As a frequent user of open-source code, I cannot stress enough how vital comprehensive documentation is for reproducibility and collaboration. The most crucial tip that I've learned is to write docstrings and comments right alongside code as you develop, not after the fact. It may sound simple, but documenting as you code leads to more thorough, accurate explanations of intent and architecture. Plus, it's much easier to document context and reasoning when the details are fresh in your mind, rather than trying to reconstruct logic after the fact.

- Document any assumptions made. - Document anything that's not self explanatory. This is very very important, as engineers we do make assumptions during the development process. Documenting the assumptions can save a lot of hours, not only during the code reviews. But throughout the maintenance and improvement cycles. Other engineers can easily understand why a module was built in certain way, and they don't have to dig through all the code base and documents to understand why. There are also times where we make choices that are not self explanatory. It's good to add them in the notes of Pull Requests, but it's also good to add them in the code.

Documenting your code should include a ReadMe.txt file or a .doc file that walkthrough the code step by step. It should explain the code in detail not limited to what assumptions are made, constant values, third party libraries used. The code should have comments and descriptions wherever necessary. Coding standards and guidelines must be followed with proper method descriptions. The business logic should be explained in comments, as the same would be helpful for the coming developers and even for the ones who has developed the code. This is because, after few days or years, the developer himself might forget the logic or the reason why something was written there.