It’s essential to clarify the question for each group of stakeholders and put the question to all without pre-judgments. Then, listen to the responses without interrupting. Summarize what you have heard, citing the physicians who spoke and repeat it back so that there is clarity of understanding for all parties—it’s a different form of teach back that is essential for next steps.

Encouragez la formation continue et la mise à jour des connaissances pour les médecins du travail. Cela peut aider à réduire les divergences d'opinion en s'assurant que tous les professionnels sont au courant des dernières avancées médicales et des meilleures pratiques.

Navigating conflicting opinions from physicians involves finding a common ground through clear communication and collaboration. I will start by gathering all viewpoints and understanding the underlying reasons for each opinion. Then, facilitate a discussion where each physician can present their concerns and suggestions openly. By focusing on patient outcomes and evidence-based practices, I can identify shared goals and work towards a compromise. It’s also crucial to involve a neutral mediator, such as a senior specialist or a committee, to help guide the discussion and ensure all voices are heard. The goal is to find a balanced solution that respects each opinion while prioritizing the best interests of the patients.

Active listening is your first step to understanding the divergent perspectives of physicians. Pay close attention not only to what is being said but also to the underlying concerns and motivations.

Seek a consensus by facilitating open discussions where each physician's concerns are addressed. Focus on shared goals and prioritize evidence-based solutions to align differing opinions.

Once you've gathered all viewpoints, objectively assess the information without bias. Consider the evidence supporting each opinion and weigh the potential outcomes.

It may help to break the communication pieces of the issue into smaller, comprehensible bits of information. This helps simplify the communication, especially on a tricky or complex issue. It also allows you to understand other perceptions or insights about sub elements. And, it allows you to link one item to the next and test that logic for the audience.

When navigating conflicting opinions from physicians, it’s essential to regulate your approach by adhering to local laws and ethical standards while prioritizing the patient’s best interests. By actively listening, objectively assessing the situation, and maintaining clear communication, you can explore alternatives that strike the right balance. The goal should always be a resolution that aligns with both legal frameworks and the patient’s needs. This emphasizes the importance of balance between legal, ethical, and patient-centered considerations.

Clear communication is essential when addressing conflicting opinions. Ensure that everyone involved understands the facts, the differing opinions, and the reasons behind them.

One thing that I have found helpful is to ask the question- what if we had no resources and we had to solve this same problem? Ingenuity, creativity and unique collaborations often come from this.

Thinking specifically about medicines, I was lucky early in my career to work with WHO on the Use of Essential Drugs. This shaped my pharmacoeconomic principles. What emerged later was P&T approval on an interim basis (especially where more data were expected) and P&T approval with no stock for strong data, low use meds

Exploring alternative solutions can often lead to a compromise that satisfies all parties.Encourage physicians to think creatively and offer different approaches to the problem at hand.

It requires diplomacy, active listening, and strategic problem-solving. To resolve disagreements, I facilitate open discussions, encouraging each expert to share their perspective and rationale. Through clarifying questions and reflective summarization, I ensure understanding and identify common goals. By acknowledging valid points and addressing concerns, I foster a collaborative environment. Navigating conflicting opinions from physicians requires diplomacy, active listening, and strategic problem-solving. To resolve disagreements, I facilitate open discussions, encouraging each expert to share their perspective and rationale. Through clarifying questions and reflective summarization, I ensure understanding and identify common goals.

Implementing the chosen solution requires tact and sensitivity. It's important to acknowledge the contributions of all physicians and explain how their input shaped the final decision.

Finally, evaluating the outcomes of the resolution is crucial for continuous improvement. Monitor the results of the decision and gather feedback from the physicians involved.