When differing opinions on robotic standards collide, striking the right balance is key. To ensure the best approach:
- Engage stakeholders in a structured dialogue to understand varying perspectives and requirements.
- Conduct a thorough risk-benefit analysis to weigh potential impacts of each proposed standard.
- Adopt an iterative process, allowing for adjustments and refinements based on real-world feedback.
How do you reconcile conflicting viewpoints to arrive at a consensus? Share your strategies.