When facing a project with tight deadlines, adding new resources requires careful evaluation. First, assess the impact versus effort by determining the value added relative to the time and resources needed. Engaging the team is crucial; their experience can reveal potential obstacles and provide insights on feasibility. Prioritize based on core project goals to ensure alignment with key objectives. Balancing innovation with time constraints is critical, often through approaches like MVP (Minimum Viable Product) to focus on the most critical features first. Incremental deliveries help manage expectations and avoid scope creep. Clear communication and strategic prioritization ensure timely and high-quality project completion.

As someone deeply immersed in this industry, I’d like to comment on deciding whether to add new features mid-project under tight deadlines. It’s crucial to assess the impact versus effort—estimating whether the value added justifies the time required. Engaging the team to leverage their insights ensures feasibility and identifies potential challenges. Lastly, aligning decisions with the project’s core goals helps maintain focus and avoid scope creep. In my experience, this approach balances innovation with practicality, ensuring timely delivery.

É sempre útil a adoção de medidas que facilitem os projetos, encurtando prazos. Mas isso requer uma avaliação criteriosa do quanto a implementação de uma nova ação de fato irá contribuir. Deve-se levar em consideração o tempo necessário a ser gasto com o novo recurso comparado ao tempo que o projeto seria finalizado sem ele. Avaliações que podem ajudar na decisão: - Temos disponíveis tudo que se precisa, para ação imediata? - A equipe possui habilidades para a inovação? - Haverá investimento adicional? - O recurso disponível antecipa fases do projeto? - Ao final, o que se ganhará com a inovação (além do tempo)? - Existe o aval da alta direção para a mudança no meio do percurso? Enfim, tendo convicção, habilidades e iniciativa, vamos!

When facing tight deadlines, adding new features mid-project should be a strategic decision. Evaluate their potential impact on project goals and timelines. Prioritize features that align closely with core objectives and provide high value to the end user. Consider resource availability—if the feature can be delivered without significant delay or quality compromise, it may be worth adding. However, if it risks derailing deadlines or diminishing overall quality, it’s better to save it for a future phase. Communication with stakeholders is key to ensuring alignment on priorities.

From my experience, clients sometimes wish to make significant changes, even late in a project. However, if the deadline is tight, it's important to first explain to the client how these changes might impact the timeline and quality of the work. Then, collaboratively work with the client to find a balance that ensures the project goals are achieved.