While the concept of habitat restoration is well-established, my addition to this concept with a new term is #HolisticHabitatHealing, which represents a paradigm shift in how we approach habitat restoration, emphasizing a comprehensive and all-encompassing approach that considers various dimensions of ecosystem health, community engagement, and the incorporation of Familial Forestry.

The term "Holistic" is at the heart of this approach. It implies that habitat restoration is not merely about fixing specific issues or planting a few trees. Instead, it encompasses a broader perspective, addressing the entire habitat as a cohesive unit. It recognizes that ecosystems are intricate webs of life where each component plays a vital role. To heal a habitat comprehensively, one must consider how all these pieces fit together.

Implementing effective ecological restoration practices requires a nuanced strategy integrating scientific rigor, community engagement, and sustainable methodologies. Begin with thorough site assessments, identifying key ecological indicators and stressors. Employ a science-based approach, incorporating native plant species and utilizing adaptive management techniques to foster biodiversity and ecosystem resilience. Collaboration with local communities ensures a holistic understanding of cultural and environmental dynamics. Implementing robust monitoring protocols allows for data-driven decision-making, ensuring the success of restoration initiatives. Leveraging cutting-edge technologies, such as GIS mapping & remote sensing.

Coming at the practice from an on-ground management point of view, assessing the restoration site against well established state & federal mapping of vegetation communities is key. Using verified and accredited experts to do in a transparent documented approach also eliminates possible contention of the site assessment at a later time. I have seen land developers sub contract, and further sub contract assessment work to personnel not really suited to the work which becomes an issue.

Use of native and local Flora and Fauna species for Ecological restoration projects. No use of synthetic and chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Biological inputs should be utilised from the very beginning of the project. Minimum tilling of restoration projects area. Flowering and fruiting trees should be incorporated to attract insects, butterflies, birds, as the integral part of Ecology. To avoid harvesting fruits and flowers from restoration projects.

The 'Bradley Method' developed in Australia for progressive restoration of degraded sites is a fantastic ecological approach worth investigating. Albeit a slow one, as it replicates a site's ability to recover from fire, weed infestation, or pollution naturally as the negative factors are steadily removed as the native seedbank establishes. The 'Peter Andrews' approach also developed to combat degraded rural landscapes in Australia is also worth highlighting particularly for erosion affected sites, as the principle of hydrating the soil and slowing water's departure from the landscape has had amazing results in dry land areas under study in Australia.

In 15 years experience with various ecological restoration projects and subsequent behavior compliance efforts around them, its apparent without long-term resourcing, many sites can suffer reversals of the gains achieved. Eg: hundreds of plantings in riparian restoration projects dying due to lack of follow up water and/or funding for maintenance weed control. Government funded programs with best intentions sometimes open a site with short term remediation works, failing to account the need to monitor invasive species in the years after initial work. Thousands of hours of work can be wasted as restored vegetation sites which looked nice for a politician's photo opportunity at one time, then appear the same or worse to pre-restoration.

I've used photo point, and random sample plot techniques to monitor results of ecological restoration on terrestrial sites which seems to be reliable. AI and drone imagery seems to be superfluous in regard to identifying individual species at the seedling level at this stage due to the subtleties in botany. In Australia there is an increasing (though long overdue) tendency to measure metrics of ecological restoration in the same manner as return on investment (ROI) for a business project, which encourages buy in from donors and the public. Considering the actual results of ecological restoration (volume of native plant cover, increased percentage of biodiversity, value of increased public amenity) can be hard to present in a tangibly.

Condensing scientific / ecological data to show a 'before & after' picture in one brief sound byte or image is difficult. Projects with a large public following I have been involved with always get the best support once a qualified marketing or media professional assists, particularly given the short attention span of social media consumers in the competition for engaging eye balls.

Follow up, follow up, follow up. In Australia I have seen award winning ecological restoration projects but unfortunately I have also been involved in failed efforts. Due mainly to funding and resourcing to maintain the results of a project being under calculated. Ecosystems will not simply look after themselves once degrading issues have been remediated. There's a need for ongoing enforcement of nature protection laws and patrolling of local areas to act on new biosecurity threats before they require major intervention. I've seen thousands of planted trees die due to weed smothering and lack of follow up irrigation in the establishment years which is a huge waste of time and money with projects basically abandoned at change of government.

The most effective ecological restoration practices necessitate a holistic approach that combines ecological science, adaptive management, and community involvement. Commence with a comprehensive ecological assessment to discern native species, ecosystem functions, and potential stressors. Prioritize the use of indigenous plant species to restore biodiversity and enhance ecosystem resilience. Engage with local communities to integrate traditional ecological knowledge, fostering a sense of ownership and sustainability. Rigorous monitoring and evaluation, utilizing advanced technologies like satellite imagery, ensure the success of restoration efforts. Employ adaptive management strategies, allowing for real-time adjustments.