1 Parliamentary debate

This is the most widely used format in academic and competitive settings. It involves two teams of two or three speakers each, who take turns to propose and oppose a motion or a resolution. The speakers have to follow strict rules of order, time, and etiquette, and they have to address each other as "Mr.", "Ms.", or "Madam" Speaker. The main advantage of this format is that it fosters quick thinking, logical reasoning, and persuasive rhetoric. The main drawback is that it can be intimidating, formal, and complex for beginners or casual debaters.

2 Public forum debate

This is a popular format for public events and media discussions. It involves two teams of two speakers each, who debate a controversial topic of current interest. The speakers have to present evidence, facts, and arguments to support their position, and they have to engage with the opposing team and the audience. The main advantage of this format is that it appeals to a wide range of people, and it encourages research, analysis, and clarity. The main drawback is that it can be superficial, biased, and oversimplified for complex issues.

3 Lincoln-Douglas debate

This is a traditional format for individual debates, named after the famous debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas in 1858. It involves two speakers who debate a moral or philosophical question, such as "Is it ever justified to break the law?". The speakers have to use values, principles, and ethics to support their case, and they have to respect the dignity and rights of their opponent. The main advantage of this format is that it develops ethical awareness, personal conviction, and eloquence. The main drawback is that it can be abstract, subjective, and irrelevant for practical problems.

4 World Schools debate

This is a newer format that combines elements of parliamentary and public forum debate. It involves three teams of three speakers each, who debate a motion or a resolution that is announced before the debate. The teams have to prepare their arguments in advance, but they also have to respond to the other teams and the questions from the judges. The main advantage of this format is that it promotes global perspectives, cultural diversity, and teamwork. The main drawback is that it can be challenging, unpredictable, and demanding for inexperienced or unprepared debaters.

Choosing the best debate format for your team depends on several factors, such as your purpose, your audience, and your time. For example, if you want to practice your skills, challenge your ideas, and have fun, you might prefer parliamentary or world schools debate. If you want to inform, persuade, and engage your listeners, you might prefer public forum or Lincoln-Douglas debate. Whatever format you choose, make sure you follow the rules, respect your opponents, and enjoy the process.

5 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?