Antes de fazer toda a verificação, deve-se realizar uma documentação e envolver todos os que serão necessarios para que seja feito de forma correta, um comitê é interessante ter.

Establishing the scope and objectives of vulnerability assessment is fundamental groundwork. This involves specifying which assets and networks to scan, the desired level of detail, and compliance requirements. By clarifying these aspects upfront, organizations can streamline scanning efforts, avoiding inefficiencies and prioritizing critical areas effectively. This proactive approach ensures resources are utilized efficiently, maximizing the impact of vulnerability assessment efforts in enhancing overall security posture.

It's pretty old school if defining scopes and objectives starting form assets and systems, the result could be nominal but missing out SaaS, portable application and shadow IT. An alternate approach could start with understanding the business priority, and carry out table-top attack simulations with business, then do follow up scanning and drill down afterwards. Sometimes, there could be surprise such as the account department have put their entire books in the CFO personal OneDrive. Meshing 2 approach carefully for the best coverage.

Clearly define the scope of your vulnerability scanning efforts, including the assets, networks, and systems you intend to assess. Identify the specific goals and objectives of your scanning program, such as identifying known vulnerabilities, detecting misconfigurations, and assessing compliance with security standards and policies.

In my opinion, utilizing various scanning methods tailored to specific attack vectors is essential for comprehensive vulnerability assessment. Each type of scan targets different aspects of the infrastructure, from network devices to individual machines and web applications, ensuring thorough coverage. By combining multiple scanning approaches, organizations can better identify and address vulnerabilities across their environment, enhancing overall security resilience. This multi-faceted approach enables proactive mitigation of risks and strengthens defenses against potential threats.

The problem isn't picking which tools to scan, you need to use multiple tools anyway. The challenge is how to correlate all these findings, and produced an unified view for prioritize, remediate or mitigate. Same problem, for example, log4j, could be reported at CI/CD, at host based scanning, at internal network scan or even at exposed public scan. Planning to fix at which level is a challenge, properly back document the mitigation is another.

Select the appropriate scanning method and tool based on your organization's needs, infrastructure, and technical environment. Consider factors such as network architecture, asset types, and regulatory requirements when choosing between active and passive scanning techniques, as well as commercial or open-source scanning tools.

Configuring and customizing scans according to your environment and requirements is crucial for maximizing their effectiveness. Fine-tuning parameters like scan speed and frequency ensures minimal disruption while still achieving thorough coverage. Tailoring scans to exclude irrelevant assets or vulnerabilities, and incorporating industry-specific checks, enhances the relevance of results. This personalized approach optimizes scan efficiency and accuracy, enabling organizations to identify and address vulnerabilities more effectively, ultimately strengthening overall security posture.

Configure your vulnerability scanning tools to conduct comprehensive scans that cover all potential attack vectors. Customize scan settings, such as scan frequency, depth, and intensity, to align with your organization's risk tolerance and security objectives. Ensure that scans are configured to assess both internal and external network assets, including servers, endpoints, web applications, and network devices.

A few more points:- - If a critical (impactful) vulnerability cannot be remediated as per the conventional patching approach (e.g, in the case of patching some legacy systems), place layers of compensating controls or work arounds, at leasttemporarily. One such example is shielding or virtual patching. - Risk based prioritising of identified vulnerabilities is very important. (e.g., consider the value of the vulnerable asset, the capablity of the the threat actors to exploit the vulnerability, existing controls surrounding the asset, and the ability to limit the damage in case of a successful compromise. - Don't flood the IT team with tool generated VA results, which is demotivating. Make analysis and reduce the report much as possible.

In my opinion, validating and prioritizing findings is crucial for effective vulnerability management. For instance, let's say a vulnerability scanner detects a critical flaw in a web application that could lead to unauthorized access. Before taking action, it's important to manually verify this finding by attempting to exploit the vulnerability through penetration testing. Additionally, using a scoring system like CVSS can help prioritize this vulnerability over others based on its potential impact, likelihood of exploitation, and ease of fixing. This approach ensures that resources are allocated to address the most urgent and impactful vulnerabilities, thereby enhancing overall security resilience.

Validate the accuracy and relevance of vulnerability scan results by conducting thorough analysis and validation of identified vulnerabilities. Prioritize vulnerabilities based on their severity, exploitability, and potential impact on your organization's security posture. Focus on addressing critical and high-risk vulnerabilities first to mitigate the most significant security threats.

In my opinion, completing the vulnerability scanning process with remediation and retesting is crucial for maintaining robust security. For instance, if a scan uncovers a critical vulnerability in a server's operating system, promptly applying the necessary patches or updates is essential. This remediation action, coordinated with the IT team, mitigates the risk of exploitation. Subsequently, retesting the server to ensure the vulnerability is resolved and conducting follow-up scans guards against potential regressions or new vulnerabilities introduced during the remediation process. By exemplifying such proactive measures, organizations enhance their security posture and resilience against evolving threats.