Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2021, Philosophy & Technology
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00486-z…
5 pages
1 file
This commentary is a response to 'More than Skin Deep' by Shelley M. Park (Park, More than skin deep: A response to "The Whiteness of AI", Philosophy & Technology, 2021), and a development of our own 2020 paper 'The Whiteness of AI'. We aim to explain how representations of AI can be varied in one sense, whilst not being diverse. We argue that Whiteness's claim to universal humanity permits a broad range of roles to White humans and White-presenting machines, whilst assigning a much narrower range of stereotypical roles to people of colour. Because the attributes of AI in the popular imagination, such as intelligence, power and passing as human, are associated by the White racial frame with Whiteness, AI is cast predominantly as White. Following Sparrow (Science, Technology, & Human Values 45:538-560, 2020), we suggest this presents a dilemma for those creating or representing AI. We discuss three possible solutions: avoiding anthropomorphisation, explicitly critiquing racial role-typing, and representing powerful AI as non-White.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Philosophy & Technology, 2021
Electronic Workshops in Computing
Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts
Democratising AI, 2019
Big Data and Society, 2023
Somatechnics: Journal of Bodies – Technologies – Power, 2024
InkStick Media, 2024
AI Agents and Subconscious Racism: Representation Matters, 2024
Ethnographic Studies, 2019
Learning, Media, and Technology, 2020
Alternation, 2021
Philosophy & Technology
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2020
Emerging Media, 2024
Philosophy and Society, 2024
Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 2019
AI and the Humanities, 2024
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews