Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
23 pages
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
This article discusses two arguments against the legalization of physician-assisted suicide, arguing that they are flawed. The author examines the implications of these arguments on American law and emphasizes the need for robust reasoning on both sides of the debate. Thomson acknowledges the existence of alternative arguments against legalization but focuses on critiquing the ones that have significantly influenced legal discourse.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Boston College Law Review, 1997
Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development, 2012
Palliative and Supportive Care, 2012
Medical Law Review, 2005
Journal of Medical Ethics, 2017
University of Richmond law review. University of Richmond, 1996
New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2006
The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2011
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 1993
The Lancet Neurology, 2003
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. , 2019
Journal of health and human resources administration, 1989
The Permanente Journal, 2012
Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of …, 2003
Hastings constitutional law quarterly
The Hastings Center Report, 1998
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 1997
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1999