Projects by Andreas Lammer
ALIVE explores a unique set of essential yet hitherto widely neglected source texts for the immed... more ALIVE explores a unique set of essential yet hitherto widely neglected source texts for the immediate context of Avicenna’s intellectual development and offers a new digital approach to the study of diverse and difficult textual corpora.
Books by Andreas Lammer
Herders Bibliothek der Philosophie des Mittelalters 55. Freiburg: Herder, 2024
The “Incoherence of the Philosophers” (completed in early 488/1095) is al-Ġazālī’s most famous – ... more The “Incoherence of the Philosophers” (completed in early 488/1095) is al-Ġazālī’s most famous – indeed infamous – work. In 20 chapters, he subjects the fundamental concepts of his philosophical contemporaries and predecessors to critical scrutiny and rejects the claim to absoluteness of their supposedly irrefutable conclusions. In doing so, he creates an impressive synthesis of critical thinking and the unwavering defence of religious claims. This book provides a selection of the most important chapters of the work in an accurate but readable translation. A detailed introduction draws the reader’s attention to the intricacies in reading al-Ġazālī and pays tribute to the often underestimated complexity of his thought.
Das Mittelalter: Perspektiven mediävistischer Forschung 29.1. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing, 2024
In view of the wealth of medieval sources that depict, describe, or otherwise discuss meteorologi... more In view of the wealth of medieval sources that depict, describe, or otherwise discuss meteorological topics, the editors of this inter- and transdisciplinary special issue have invited various colleagues to investigate and demonstrate how meteorological phenomena were sometimes the starting point and sometimes the goal of theory formation in different cultures and periods of the so-called Middle Ages. The studies collected here bring to light the comprehensive existential significance of meteorology as a pre-modern science and endeavour.
Traditio Praesocratica 4. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2022
The fourth volume of the series contains the Greek, Latin, and Arabic testimonies – from the four... more The fourth volume of the series contains the Greek, Latin, and Arabic testimonies – from the fourth century BC to the late Middle Ages – on the life and teachings of the three Ancient Greek philosophers Alcmaeon, Hippon, and Menestor in chronological order and with a German translation. While Alcmaeon of Croton received attention due to his theories on the physiology of the senses (theories he might have formed on the basis of empirical evidence), Hippon of Metapont (?) was known to later authors mainly because of his epithet describing him as 'godless.' Menestor of Sybaris, on the other hand, appears in Theophrastus' botanical works, in which he is portrayed as a respectable predecessor of botanic research. All testimonies are provided with short contextual information on the respective source and furnished with thematically ordered references, which help trace the transmission and the reception contexts.
Philosophia antiqua: A Series of Studies on Ancient Philosophy 160. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2022
This volume – the proceedings of a 2018 conference at LMU Munich funded by the Fritz Thyssen Foun... more This volume – the proceedings of a 2018 conference at LMU Munich funded by the Fritz Thyssen Foundation – brings together, for the rst time, experts on Greek, Syriac, and Arabic traditions of doxography. Fourteen contributions provide new insight into state-of-the-art contemporary research on the widespread phenomenon of doxography. Together, they demonstrate how Greek, Syriac, and Arabic forms of doxography share common features and raise related questions that benefit interdisciplinary exchange among colleagues from various disciplines, such as classics, Arabic studies, and the history of philosophy.
Scientia graeco-arabica 20. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2018
This study is the first comprehensive analysis of the physical theory of the Islamic philosopher ... more This study is the first comprehensive analysis of the physical theory of the Islamic philosopher Avicenna (d. 1037). It seeks to understand his contribution against the developments within the preceding Greek and Arabic intellectual milieus, and to appreciate his philosophy as such by emphasising his independence as a critical and systematic thinker. Exploring Avicenna’s method of "teaching and learning," it investigates the implications of his account of the natural body as a three-dimensionally extended composite of matter and form, and examines his views on nature as a principle of motion and his analysis of its relation to soul. Moreover, it demonstrates how Avicenna defends the Aristotelian conception of place against the strident criticism of his predecessors, among other things, by disproving the existence of void and space. Finally, it sheds new light on Avicenna’s account of the essence and the existence of time. For the first time taking into account the entire range of Avicenna’s major writings, this study fills a gap in our understanding both of the history of natural philosophy in general and of the philosophy of Avicenna in particular.
Winner of the BRAIS-De Gruyter Prize 2017:
http://www.brais.ac.uk/prize/2017-announcement
Winner of the Bavarian Culture Prize 2017:
https://www.bayernwerk.de/content/dam/revu-global/bayernwerk/documents/ueber-bayernwerk/engagement/kultur-und-tradition/kulturpreis-bayern/2017/pm-uni/KB2017_Andreas_Lammer_LMU_Muenchen.pdf
Winner of the World Award for Book of the Year 2020:
http://bookaward.ir/NewsDetails-En/1047/Report-On-the-27th-I-R--Iran-World-Award-for-Book-of-the-Year
Papers by Andreas Lammer
In: The Elements in the Medieval World: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 1: Water. Edited by Marilina Cesario, Hugh Magennis, and Elisa Ramazzina. Elements, Nature, Environment: Multidisciplinary Perspectives from the Ancient to the Early Modern World 1. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2024
Investigating a number of key texts that were available in Arabic to the beginning of the elevent... more Investigating a number of key texts that were available in Arabic to the beginning of the eleventh century, this contribution focuses on the water cycle before Avicenna (d. 428/1037) entered the stage, composed his own Meteorology, and transformed the tradition. In order to assess the prevalent ideas on the hydrological circle, we shall examine (1) rising water, (2) falling water, (3) flowing water, and (4) deep water.
In: Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 69, 2022
This article – in two parts – provides central texts in Greek, Syriac, and Arabic that exemplify ... more This article – in two parts – provides central texts in Greek, Syriac, and Arabic that exemplify the traditional view on matter and body in the history of philosophy before turning to central texts that exemplify a new, non-traditional view which apparently developed (or reached its mature formulation) in sixth-century Alexandria, thus approaching the question whether there are also adherents of the non-traditional view in the Arabic tradition, who might, then, not only have had an impact on Avicenna but perhaps even on the post-Avicennian tradition of Arabic philosophy.
In: Routledge Handbook on the Sciences in Islamicate Societies: Practices from the 2nd/8th to the 13th/19th Centuries. Edited by Sonja Brentjes with Peter Barker and Rana Brentjes. London: Routledge, 2022
Philosophy, as it was conceived in the Islamicate world, was "science" in its broadest terms. It ... more Philosophy, as it was conceived in the Islamicate world, was "science" in its broadest terms. It was divided into theoretical sciences, practical sciences and applied sciences. While applied sciences included, for example, astrology, agriculture and medicine, practical sciences comprised, for instance, ethics and politics. The theoretical sciences, in turn, split into four areas: logic, mathematics, natural philosophy and metaphysics. Of these, natural philosophy was further divided into seven "particular" investigations. These were concerned with the heavenly bodies, the elements, meteorological phenomena, minerals, plants, animals and the soul, respectively. Additionally, one fundamental or "common" science – called "physics" – covered all concepts immediately relevant not only for all the seven particular disciplines within natural philosophy but also for a number of the applied sciences such as medicine and astrology. It is important to understand that the term "natural philosophy" was not synonymous with "physics" but demarcated a wide scientific area concerned with the exploration of all the aspects and the inner governing structures of the corporeal world, whereas "physics" was but one – if the most essential – of its disciplines. This contribution outlines salient points of theory and practice in natural philosophy as well as their development within Islamicate Societies from the second/eighth to the eighth/fourteenth century.
In: Abū Naṣr al-Fārābī: Die Prinzipien der Ansichten der Bewohner der vortrefflichen Stadt. Edited by Ulrich Rudolph. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2022
In this contribution, I analyse chapters 4-5 and 8-9 of al-Fārābī's best known work "The Principl... more In this contribution, I analyse chapters 4-5 and 8-9 of al-Fārābī's best known work "The Principles of Opinions of the Inhabitants of the Excellent City" and explain how its author conceived of strutcure of the cosmos, in particular that of the sublunary world. Focusing on his "scientific" explanation, I argue that al-Fārābī considers the sublunary world and its atmosphere as a complex "eco-system" inhabitaed by a large variety of different creatures and subject to a range of internal and external influences. He is convinced that the causes of the phenomena "down here" can be identified and ultimately derived from the celestial principles "up there." However, by limiting himself to presenting only the basics of this scientific explanation, it becomes apparent that he subordinates what he considers scientifically possible to the didactic intention of his text.
In: Received Opinions: Doxography in Antiquity and the Islamic World. Edited by Andreas Lammer and Mareike Jas. Philosophia antiqua: A Series of Studies on Ancient Philosophy 160. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2022
In the preface to his Physics, Avicenna announces that he intends to follow "the order which the ... more In the preface to his Physics, Avicenna announces that he intends to follow "the order which the philosophy of the Peripatetics follows." While it, accordingly, does not come as a surprise that Avicenna – like Aristotle and his commentators – indeed discussed Presocratic theories in chapter I.4 of his Physics, it is striking that he – unlike Aristotle and his commentators – did so only briefly and seemingly with much less respect. This paper provides an explanation for Avicenna's critical, if not harsh, attitude towards his ancient predecessors in that chapter. It will be shown that, his statement in the preface notwithstanding, Avicenna wrote this chapter only upon direct request by his disciples and that, moreover, he did so only reluctantly, especially because a discussion or refutation of Presocratic theories neither fits his agenda in the Physics nor concords with the scientific methodology he has developed in the previous chapters of the Physics and in his Posterior Analytics. This interpretation is further substantiated through a reading of Avicenna's remarks on the Presocratics in two other works which are both central to Avicenna's thought and contain in their Aristotelian counterparts lengthy discussion of the Presocratics, namely his De anima and the Metaphysics.
In: Shifting Horizons: A Line and its Movement in Art, History and Philosophy. Edited by Lucas Burkart and Beate Fricke. Colloquia Raurica 17. Basel/Berlin: Schwabe Verlag, 2022
In this contribution, I present the instrinsic fascination of cosmic boundaries and their transgr... more In this contribution, I present the instrinsic fascination of cosmic boundaries and their transgressions, including their problems and opportunities, in order to shed light on the powerful world view of late ancient and medieval philosophers and scientists. At the centre of my considerations will be the conception of natural philosophy that, by and large, prevailed throughout the centuries and represented the scientific state of the art for two thousand years – from the fourth century BCE to the sixteenth century CE – largely unchallenged (at least in the Near Eastern-North African-European cultural reagion): the world view of Aristotelian natural philosophy. In three steps I, first, investigate the "Heavens" and the limiting circle of the universe as a whole (should there be one). Then, I look at the boundary between the supralunary "Heavens" and the sublunar "Earth" and, finally, discuss transboundary phenomena within the sublunar realm of the "Earth".
In: Heteronome Texte: Kommentierende und tradierende Literatur in Antike und Mittelalter. Edited by Katharina Bracht, Jan Dirk Harke, Matthias Perkams, and Meinolf Vielberg. Transmissions: Studies on Conditions, Processes and Dynamics of Textual Transmission 6. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2022
Texts with philosophical content belong to various genres, of which some have proved to have exer... more Texts with philosophical content belong to various genres, of which some have proved to have exerted tremendous influence within the history of philosophy. Among these, we find treatises (especially but not exclusively of Aristotle) and the epitomes, paraphrases, and commentaries of subsequent Peripatetics and Platonists. These four genres of texts not only shaped the philosophical traditions of Late Antiquity, being embedded in the curricula of Greek and Syriac schools, they were also at the centre of attention of the driving forces behind and in the Graeco-Arabic translation movement following the ʿAbbāsid revolution in 132 AH/750 CE. What is more, these genres continued to be of utmost significance also within the Arabic philosophical tradition leading up to its pivotal exponent Avicenna and in the wake of his accomplishments. This contribution aims to provide an accessible account of the complex transmission of philosophical texts from Greek Antiquity into the Arabic (so-called) Middle Ages by means of focusing on the history of treatises, epitomes, paraphrases, and commentaries, and sheds new light on the formation of the post-Avicennian period and its textual tradition.
In: The Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Religion. Edited by Stewart Goetz and Charles Taliaferro. 4 volumes. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2022
Avicenna was the most significant Muslim philosopher and physician of the Middle Ages. He underst... more Avicenna was the most significant Muslim philosopher and physician of the Middle Ages. He understood philosophy as a systematic and universal scientific endeavor, and considerably shaped the way in which theological and religious matters – just as much as concerns from within metaphysics, natural philosophy, and logic – have been conceived by Muslim, Christian, and Jewish authors writing in the wake of his accomplishments. His long-lasting influence is attested by numerous commentaries and reactions to his account of reality. Central aspects of his philosophy include the account of God as well as the scientific explanation of creation, prophecy, evil, and the afterlife.
In: Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 9, 2021
Experts on Avicenna's natural philosophy are in agreement that for Avicenna, time exists as the r... more Experts on Avicenna's natural philosophy are in agreement that for Avicenna, time exists as the result of a now which flows and which through its flow produces time. Having been a prominent interpretation of Aristotle's account of time in the Physics, the theory of the 'flowing now' was known to Avicenna from ancient and late ancient commentaries, and is mentioned in his most detailed discussion of time from his seminal work The Cure. It is, however, absent from all his other accounts of time and even within his argumentation in The Cure, there are strong, hereto-fore neglected reasons to believe that Avicenna ultimately did not adopt this idea. This article provides a full investigation of Avicenna's theory of the now and investigates its position within the larger context of his temporal theory, arguing – against the current consensus – that for Avicenna, time is not produced by the now through its flow.
In: Zur gesellschaftlichen Integration neuzugewanderter Menschen: Eine Bilanz. Edited by Renate Freudenberg-Findeisen, Claudia Harsch, and Annegret Middeke. Materialien Deutsch als Fremd- und Zweitsprache 105. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag, 2021
The complex question of whether or not Islam forms part of and belongs to Germany is, alongside i... more The complex question of whether or not Islam forms part of and belongs to Germany is, alongside its societal and political dimensions, a historical question, which can only be answered with diligence and effort (as is typical of historical questions). The good thing about such a question, however, is that it indeed can be answered, and that the knowledge thus acquired can also be communicated and disseminated, if scholars conscientiously working on the subject are given the appropriate and required space to do so. A beginning can be made by realising that representatives of simplifying terms such as "Islam" and "Germany" are nowhere to be found in history. Rather, the history one understands as "one's own" has always been unfolding within a territory that had long been shaped by the diverse interplay of an abundance of, among others, Islamic-Middle Eastern and Christian-European traditions.
In: Philosophical Theology in Islam: Later Ashʿarism East and West. Edited by Ayman Shihadeh and Jan Thiele. Islamicate Intellectual History: Studies and Texts in the Late Medieval and Early Modern Periods 5. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2020
When we think of Ašʿarī responses to Avicenna (d. 428/1037), the first author to come to mind is ... more When we think of Ašʿarī responses to Avicenna (d. 428/1037), the first author to come to mind is al-Ġazālī (d. 505/1111), thanks to his Tahāfut al-falāsifa. This work is dominated by issues of philosophical theology. However, the Ašʿarī reactions to Avicenna both precede and exceed the Tahāfut. We already find al-Ġazālī's teacher al-Ǧuwaynī (d. 478/1085) drawing on Avicenna and, alongside the Tahāfut, another early attack on Avicenna came from al-Šahrastānī (d. 548/1153). It was only the beginning of centuries' worth of Ašʿarī engagement with Avicennian philosophy. This tradition had much to say about philosophical theology. Moreover, it is well known that theologians delved into Avicenna's logic too. Yet, Ašʿarī authors also took an interest in physics and treated this as a discipline worthy of discussion in its own right, while of course keeping sight of its significance for theology. An excellent example of such a engagement is the treatment of time given by the greatest Avicennising Ašʿarite of them all, Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 606/1210). On the following pages, we shall analyse the relevant section of Faḫr al-Dīn's al-Maṭālib and show how it differs from the discussions of time in his earlier systematic works. We will also provide occasional references to his commentaries on two of Avicenna's works: al-Išārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt and the brief compendium ʿUyūn al-ḥikma.
In: Islamic Philosophy from the 12th to the 14th Century. Edited by Abdelkader Al Ghouz. Mamluk Studies 20. Göttingen: Bonn University Press and V&R unipress, 2018
If the philosophical discussion about the question whether the world existed from all eternity or... more If the philosophical discussion about the question whether the world existed from all eternity or was created in time were a story, it would start with some exegetical issues in Plato, introduce the Unmoved Mover of Aristotle, continue with some Neoplatonic ingenuity at the hands of Proclus, and end with even more ingenuity from Philoponus. That story would, then, have become so famous that it was worth translating into Arabic in a revised version by al-Kindī, to which Avicenna would write a sequel and al-Ġazālī the finale. Today, this trilogy would predominantly be sold with an elaborate, even if somewhat sterile, afterword by Averroes, and be celebrated as an epic classic, being reissued again and again in ever cheaper paperbacks.
The story, however, would also have created a spin-off which only recently would have garnered some fame. This spin-off would introduce many new characters – among them Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Karīm al-Šahrastānī (d. 548/1153) and Abū l-Barakāt al-Baġdādī (d. 560/1164-5) – and continue the story after al-Ġazālī, with plenty of recurring elements but also with fresh material. Moreover, it would unfold in a new context: the philosophical milieu of the Islamic East, focusing in the first instalments on twelfth-century Baġdād, the capital city of the ʿAbbāsid caliphate and one of the most vibrant intellectual centres of the Selğūk empire.
Both al-Šahrastānī and Abū l-Barakāt were thoroughly familiar with the philosophy of Avicenna. Indeed, they are notoriously known as two of his fiercest critics. They belonged to the intellectual elite in the philosophical milieu of Baġdād in the early twelfth century, each composing works in which they provided their own detailed discussion of God, the world, priority, relation, and eternity; yet, although drawing on the same materials and investigating the same question, they offered solutions entirely at odds with one another.
In this paper, I shall investigate their positions, their arguments, and their sources regarding the question of the eternity of the world and the nature of God's priority to His creation.
In: The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna's Physics and Cosmology. Edited by Dag Nikolaus Hasse and Amos Bertolacci. Scientia graeco-arabica 23. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2018
In this article, I examine al-Āmidī's chapter on time in one of his main works, the "Abkār al-afk... more In this article, I examine al-Āmidī's chapter on time in one of his main works, the "Abkār al-afkār fī uṣūl al-dīn", discussing his exposition of Avicenna's account of time as well as his own contribution to the topic. I have prefaced my analysis with a historical outline of two important aspects which are relevant for understanding the background of al-Āmidī's discussion of time and, indeed, of any such discussion in the thirteenth century. In an appendix, I provide an edition of the Arabic text of al-Āmidī's chapter together with a facing English translation.
In: Das Mittelalter: Perspektiven mediävistischer Forschung 23.1: Maß und Maßlosigkeit im Mittelalter. Edited by Isabelle Mandrella and Kathrin Müller, 2018
This paper traces the reception of the Aristotelian definition of time from its earliest (Boethus... more This paper traces the reception of the Aristotelian definition of time from its earliest (Boethus of Sidon) to its most authoritative interpretations (Alexander of Aphrodisias), and describes how their readings pave the way for a sophisticated amalgamation of divergent Aristotelian and Platonic elements in the temporal theory of Avicenna. The focus of attention lies on specific perceptions of the relation between time and motion, more precisely on the contrary descriptions of time as the measure of motion and motion as the measure of time. The latter leads to a conception of time as a universal self-subsisting substance beyond all measure, and the former to an understanding of time as an accident providing all motion with its particular measure. It is the antagonism between these two conceptions, both inherent in the Arabic term miqdār ("measure, magnitude") at the heart of Avicenna's definition of time, which arguably informs the Latin tradition and thereby also shapes the early modern contrast between objective and subjective theories of time.
Uploads
Projects by Andreas Lammer
Books by Andreas Lammer
Winner of the BRAIS-De Gruyter Prize 2017:
http://www.brais.ac.uk/prize/2017-announcement
Winner of the Bavarian Culture Prize 2017:
https://www.bayernwerk.de/content/dam/revu-global/bayernwerk/documents/ueber-bayernwerk/engagement/kultur-und-tradition/kulturpreis-bayern/2017/pm-uni/KB2017_Andreas_Lammer_LMU_Muenchen.pdf
Winner of the World Award for Book of the Year 2020:
http://bookaward.ir/NewsDetails-En/1047/Report-On-the-27th-I-R--Iran-World-Award-for-Book-of-the-Year
Papers by Andreas Lammer
The story, however, would also have created a spin-off which only recently would have garnered some fame. This spin-off would introduce many new characters – among them Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Karīm al-Šahrastānī (d. 548/1153) and Abū l-Barakāt al-Baġdādī (d. 560/1164-5) – and continue the story after al-Ġazālī, with plenty of recurring elements but also with fresh material. Moreover, it would unfold in a new context: the philosophical milieu of the Islamic East, focusing in the first instalments on twelfth-century Baġdād, the capital city of the ʿAbbāsid caliphate and one of the most vibrant intellectual centres of the Selğūk empire.
Both al-Šahrastānī and Abū l-Barakāt were thoroughly familiar with the philosophy of Avicenna. Indeed, they are notoriously known as two of his fiercest critics. They belonged to the intellectual elite in the philosophical milieu of Baġdād in the early twelfth century, each composing works in which they provided their own detailed discussion of God, the world, priority, relation, and eternity; yet, although drawing on the same materials and investigating the same question, they offered solutions entirely at odds with one another.
In this paper, I shall investigate their positions, their arguments, and their sources regarding the question of the eternity of the world and the nature of God's priority to His creation.
Winner of the BRAIS-De Gruyter Prize 2017:
http://www.brais.ac.uk/prize/2017-announcement
Winner of the Bavarian Culture Prize 2017:
https://www.bayernwerk.de/content/dam/revu-global/bayernwerk/documents/ueber-bayernwerk/engagement/kultur-und-tradition/kulturpreis-bayern/2017/pm-uni/KB2017_Andreas_Lammer_LMU_Muenchen.pdf
Winner of the World Award for Book of the Year 2020:
http://bookaward.ir/NewsDetails-En/1047/Report-On-the-27th-I-R--Iran-World-Award-for-Book-of-the-Year
The story, however, would also have created a spin-off which only recently would have garnered some fame. This spin-off would introduce many new characters – among them Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Karīm al-Šahrastānī (d. 548/1153) and Abū l-Barakāt al-Baġdādī (d. 560/1164-5) – and continue the story after al-Ġazālī, with plenty of recurring elements but also with fresh material. Moreover, it would unfold in a new context: the philosophical milieu of the Islamic East, focusing in the first instalments on twelfth-century Baġdād, the capital city of the ʿAbbāsid caliphate and one of the most vibrant intellectual centres of the Selğūk empire.
Both al-Šahrastānī and Abū l-Barakāt were thoroughly familiar with the philosophy of Avicenna. Indeed, they are notoriously known as two of his fiercest critics. They belonged to the intellectual elite in the philosophical milieu of Baġdād in the early twelfth century, each composing works in which they provided their own detailed discussion of God, the world, priority, relation, and eternity; yet, although drawing on the same materials and investigating the same question, they offered solutions entirely at odds with one another.
In this paper, I shall investigate their positions, their arguments, and their sources regarding the question of the eternity of the world and the nature of God's priority to His creation.
The contributors investigated and assessed the relations between these eight works, their intended readership and Avicenna’s intentions in them alongside his style, terminology, and arguments as well as his personal and doctrinal development. The conference was funded by the Fritz Thyssen Stiftung and Trier University.