Gadi Sagiv
Related Authors
Marcin Wodzinski
University of Wroclaw
Waldemar Spallek
University of Wroclaw
fatih memiç
Kirklareli University
Mercédesz Czimbalmos
Åbo Akademi University
Wojciech Tworek
University of Wroclaw
Uriel Gellman
Bar-Ilan University
Morris Faierstein
Independent Scholar
Leore Sachs Shmueli
Bar-Ilan University
Jonatan Meir
Ben Gurion University of the Negev
moshe rosman
Bar-Ilan University
InterestsView All (38)
Uploads
Books by Gadi Sagiv
Papers by Gadi Sagiv
movements with dynastic leadership. This article investigates
marital strategies among the leaders of Hasidism, arguably the
most prominent socio-religious movement of modern Jewry. The
study is based on complete documentation records of all
marriages by Hasidic leaders from the inception of Hasidism in
the 1700s until today: 2,375 marital unions, mostly in 122
dynasties. The data demonstrate a tendency among Hasidic
leaders to marry off their children to other Hasidic dynasties,
thereby forming a pattern of inter-dynastic connections. We also
demonstrate that Hasidic leaders have avoided upward mobility
and preferred to marry their children to dynasties with a similar
social status. Most importantly, the ultimate gain of such
marriages is not material or political gain but rather the
maintenance of religious charisma. These findings explain how
Hasidic dynasties emerged, expanded, eroded, and negotiated
their status within the network of dynasties.
This paper aims to sketch a preliminary map of the tekhelet
debate that took place after the introduction of the second tekhelet in the 1980s. It opens with a brief history of tekhelet, followed by a description of the dominant narrative of contemporary tekhelet, and its main opponents. The rest of the article presents central focal points of the controversy: debates regarding the production of the dye; issues of authority regarding acceptance of the new tekhelet; and a messianic tension revealed by the discussion of tekhelet. By providing a non-Orthodox account of the tekhelet debate, this article sheds light on contemporary tekhelet discourse yet also exposes fundamental issues in contemporary Orthodox Judaism, particularly with respect to the relationship between religion and science, and the tension between radicalism and conservatism.
Events by Gadi Sagiv
movements with dynastic leadership. This article investigates
marital strategies among the leaders of Hasidism, arguably the
most prominent socio-religious movement of modern Jewry. The
study is based on complete documentation records of all
marriages by Hasidic leaders from the inception of Hasidism in
the 1700s until today: 2,375 marital unions, mostly in 122
dynasties. The data demonstrate a tendency among Hasidic
leaders to marry off their children to other Hasidic dynasties,
thereby forming a pattern of inter-dynastic connections. We also
demonstrate that Hasidic leaders have avoided upward mobility
and preferred to marry their children to dynasties with a similar
social status. Most importantly, the ultimate gain of such
marriages is not material or political gain but rather the
maintenance of religious charisma. These findings explain how
Hasidic dynasties emerged, expanded, eroded, and negotiated
their status within the network of dynasties.
This paper aims to sketch a preliminary map of the tekhelet
debate that took place after the introduction of the second tekhelet in the 1980s. It opens with a brief history of tekhelet, followed by a description of the dominant narrative of contemporary tekhelet, and its main opponents. The rest of the article presents central focal points of the controversy: debates regarding the production of the dye; issues of authority regarding acceptance of the new tekhelet; and a messianic tension revealed by the discussion of tekhelet. By providing a non-Orthodox account of the tekhelet debate, this article sheds light on contemporary tekhelet discourse yet also exposes fundamental issues in contemporary Orthodox Judaism, particularly with respect to the relationship between religion and science, and the tension between radicalism and conservatism.