Miklós Király
Miklós Király is full professor and former dean of the Faculty of Law, Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Budapest. He is Head of the Department of Private International Law and European Economic Law and Director of ELTE Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence. His research focuses on the interface between harmonisation of substantive law and conflict of laws.
He was senior counsel at the Prime Minister's Office (1990-1992), member of the Board of State Property Agency (1992-1994) and adviser on EU law at the Ministry of Social and Family Affairs (1998-2001). He served as adviser of the President of the Republic of Hungary (2002-2005) and as member of the UNIDROIT Governing Council (2014-2018).
Phone: +36 1 411 6527
Address: 1053 Budapest, Egyetem tér 1-3., Hungary
He was senior counsel at the Prime Minister's Office (1990-1992), member of the Board of State Property Agency (1992-1994) and adviser on EU law at the Ministry of Social and Family Affairs (1998-2001). He served as adviser of the President of the Republic of Hungary (2002-2005) and as member of the UNIDROIT Governing Council (2014-2018).
Phone: +36 1 411 6527
Address: 1053 Budapest, Egyetem tér 1-3., Hungary
less
Related Authors
Michel Erpelding
Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
Dariusz Szostek
University of Silesia in Katowice
Rafał Skibicki
Uniwersytet Wrocławski
Valerie Rosoux
UCLouvain (University of Louvain)
Mateusz Piątkowski
University of Lodz, Poland
Uploads
Papers by Miklós Király
factors give rise to an international situation. The legal literature has been wrestling with this question for decades. This paper compares the different documents designating the applicable law for international sales and contracts from this perspective. This comparative analysis stretches from the1955 Hague Convention to the 2015 Hague Principles to demonstrate the different approaches. The second part of the study focuses on the partly related problem of universal application. The author
concludes that the diverging solutions of domestic conflict of laws infiltrate the norms of uniform conflict of laws instruments in the first area under examination. However, the need for universal application is generally accepted in relation to conflict of laws instruments.
factors give rise to an international situation. The legal literature has been wrestling with this question for decades. This paper compares the different documents designating the applicable law for international sales and contracts from this perspective. This comparative analysis stretches from the1955 Hague Convention to the 2015 Hague Principles to demonstrate the different approaches. The second part of the study focuses on the partly related problem of universal application. The author
concludes that the diverging solutions of domestic conflict of laws infiltrate the norms of uniform conflict of laws instruments in the first area under examination. However, the need for universal application is generally accepted in relation to conflict of laws instruments.